首页> 外文OA文献 >The local politics of creative industries policies in China. An analysis of Chinese municipal creative industries policies from different regions. The case of Beijing, Harbin and Guangzhou
【2h】

The local politics of creative industries policies in China. An analysis of Chinese municipal creative industries policies from different regions. The case of Beijing, Harbin and Guangzhou

机译:中国创意产业政策的地方政治。不同地区的中国市政创意产业政策分析。北京,哈尔滨和广州的案例

摘要

One of the central debates about the development and adoption of the 'creative industries' policy discourse in the UK has been about whether it is best understood as neoliberal. China imported the policy discourse of 'creative industries' from the UK in the 2000s and neoliberalism may also be one important characteristic of Chinese creative industries policies. However, the Chinese context is different from that of the UK in terms of state control, local autonomy, regional inequality, all of which have an influence on the interpretations and applications of the creative industries in China. This research advances the understanding of the development of Chinese creative industries policies through an analysis of the municipal creative industries policies from different regions, including Beijing, Harbin and Guangzhou. It draws on data from policy documents, extensive interviews with local policy makers and official data to provide a multi-dimensional analysis of policies from the three cities during 2001-20 I 3.\udIn summary, this research argues that since policy makers began to make local creative industries policies, they have increasingly displayed a commercially and digitally oriented trend in promoting the marketisation of culture in an authoritarian context. The Chinese creative industries policies have not simply followed the understandings of British creative industries policies, and different cities emphasise neoliberal elements, authoritarian elements and welfare provision to different extents. The policies cannot be simply described by ready-made terms like neoliberalism, or 'neoliberalism with Chinese characteristics', but must be studied in local context to reveal their variety and specificity.
机译:关于在英国发展和采用“创意产业”政策话语的核心辩论之一是,是否最好地将其理解为新自由主义。中国在2000年代从英国进口了“创意产业”的政策话语,新自由主义也可能是中国创意产业政策的重要特征之一。但是,在国家控制,地方自治,地区不平等方面,中国背景与英国背景不同,所有这些因素都对中国创意产业的解释和应用产生影响。通过对包括北京,哈尔滨和广州在内的不同地区的市政创意产业政策进行分析,本研究提高了对中国创意产业政策发展的理解。它利用政策文件中的数据,对地方政策制定者的广泛采访以及官方数据来对2001-20 I 3年间三个城市的政策进行多维分析。\ ud总之,这项研究认为,自政策制定者开始在制定地方创意产业政策时,他们越来越显示出在威权主义背景下促进文化市场化的商业化和数字化趋势。中国的创意产业政策不仅遵循英国创意产业政策的理解,而且不同城市在不同程度上强调新自由主义要素,威权主义要素和福利供给。这些政策不能简单地用现成的术语(如新自由主义或“中国特色的新自由主义”)来描述,而必须在当地进行研究以揭示其多样性和特殊性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Ken;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:46:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号